Actual problem “Herd” and its solution [+survey]

Good day to everyone.
I am increasingly starting to notice the touches of the “herd” problem. And in the last translated output of “Treasury”, I again encountered this (with the touches of the problem) and I had an idea how to solve this problem, which I voiced in the comments. The idea seemed pretty good for some people, so I pull it out of the debate of comments on public display.

Here, in fact, the idea itself in the wilds of the comments:

It is necessary to ensure that the reading messages are displayed only if you yourself have voted for it (set + or -). Then the problem of the “herd” will disappear at all.

That’s all. Write what you think about this, and what are the disadvantages, in your opinion, this idea, T.To. I myself have not thought about it yet.

P.S. I’m still not understanding if https://mrslotycasino.co.uk/ it is permissible to write “the current problem of herdsA“. Please write in the commentary. If all the same, I will better fix it, t.To. It seems to me that it sounds better.

The best comments

The idea is certainly cool, but there is another side.
Suppose a certain topic is some cool comment, and it would be great if it had been read as many people as possible. If the rating is not displayed, the comment merges with others, and many readers may not notice it. The opposite situation: someone has posted a screamer, no one sees a rating of -20 and click on the link.
So I would suggest not displaying the rating if it is in the range from -5 to +5, for example

Only mass executions will save this country.
Another, meaningless post. We will all die. There is no way out. There is nothing. Our whole life is illusion. It makes no sense in it. We will not do anything great. Our existence is meaningless. We serve the beggar worms. We are a decay. We are rot. We are nothing.

In fact, the whole situation with Madrenic is clearly and cold -blooded with the departure from blogs, with the infusion of money and involving the very tops of the reign of the SG in the process. Everything is paid and even funny, at first glance, the reason for the ban was discussed by the best minds of Cambridge and Oxford for more than one month.

Who is a good fairy tale enters the site,
Who is familiar with registration,
Who is not a scientist, not a poet,
And he conquered all the white light.
Who will be recognized everywhere,
Tell me, what is his name?
Mu-day Rinat.

No, he under the “herd” of hamsters. A good thought suggested, someone will reach Rinat Dejavu. There is a feeling that now someone will say “Rinat“ Kaim ”and will not answer … Brrrr

Why don’t try? If the site administration listens to small people Bloggers, this will be our common victory over the system! Something pulled me on the slogans ..

So I ask about the meaning. It is clear that you can try anything. You can insert a finger into the ass – why not try. But why?

There is such a thing. I have encountered more than once personally. The effect intensifies if you are not only minuses, but also your opponent has pluses. It is impossible to eradicate similar methods. This is in the genes. And the author’s method is too kind of some kind of … I don’t know … Children? I’m in posts with a lot of comments on the pluses I find good comments with funny and other dicks. You haven’t taken into account this, author, yes. Well, as for me, it is not worth it. Smile off. Everything is really thrlen. But someone should remain guilty.